Schools and the Pandemic: How COVID-19 Disrupted Bangladesh Education

Eighteen Months Without a Classroom

On March 17, 2020, Bangladesh shut every school in the country. What was announced as a temporary measure lasted eighteen months — one of the longest pandemic-related school closures in the world. When schools finally reopened on September 12, 2021, around 37 million children returned to classrooms that could not fully account for what had been lost. And in January 2022, the government closed them again for another month to manage the Omicron wave.

The numbers that came out of this period are not abstract education statistics. They represent a generation of Bangladeshi children whose foundational learning — the reading, numeracy, and cognitive development that happen in the early school years and cannot simply be made up later — was disrupted at the precise moment it was supposed to be happening. Understanding what occurred in Bangladesh's schools during COVID-19, and what it will cost if the damage is not actively repaired, is one of the most important education policy questions the country faces.

What 18 Months Out of School Actually Means

Bangladesh's education system was not in strong shape before the pandemic arrived. World Bank data from 2017 showed that more than half of Bangladeshi children completing primary school could not read and comprehend a simple text. Pre-pandemic Learning Adjusted Years of Schooling — a measure that accounts for both time in school and actual quality of learning received — stood at around 6 years for a child who had nominally completed 10.2 years of schooling. The system was delivering significantly less learning than the years of attendance suggested.

The pandemic made this worse in ways that simulations have now quantified with uncomfortable precision. The World Bank estimated that COVID-19 school closures would result in a loss of between 0.5 and 0.9 years of learning-adjusted schooling for an average Bangladeshi student. In an intermediate scenario of nine months of effective closure, LAYS would fall from 6 years to 5.3 years. UNICEF's more alarming projection estimated that 76% of Bangladeshi children would fail to attain minimum reading proficiency by the end of primary school as a result of the closures — up from 58% before the pandemic.

For an individual student, the World Bank calculated that the average Bangladeshi child would face a reduction of around $335 in yearly earnings when they enter the labor market — approximately 6.8% of annual income. Aggregated across the entire student population and projected forward ten years, the cost to Bangladesh's economy reaches up to $114 billion in GDP at net present value. These are not hypothetical worst-case scenarios. They are baseline estimates based on what is already known about the relationship between learning loss and lifetime economic productivity.

Who Was Hit Hardest

School closures in Bangladesh did not affect all children equally. The pandemic's educational damage followed existing fault lines of inequality — rural versus urban, poor versus less poor, girls versus boys — and in most cases made those gaps significantly wider.

For girls, the consequences were particularly severe. When schools closed and families faced economic pressure, the calculation for many rural households shifted against keeping daughters in school. According to Bangladesh Education Statistics data, the completion rate for girl students decreased and their dropout rate increased by almost 6% at the secondary level in 2021 compared to 2020. A significant proportion of those girls were married off during the closure period. Early marriage — which removes girls from the education system permanently in most cases — increased measurably during the pandemic years, representing not just an educational setback but a human rights crisis with lifelong consequences.

For boys from poor families, the pressure took a different form. Many were absorbed into the workforce to compensate for household income losses during lockdowns. A survey of 409 Bangladeshi students found that 76% reported their family income decreased because of the pandemic. With parents losing jobs, taking pay cuts, or losing tutoring income, children became economic assets rather than students. A 17-year-old in Chittagong quoted in World Bank research captured it directly: there was no money coming in, and staying in school felt impossible.

The digital divide added another layer of inequality. Bangladesh's remote learning response — TV broadcasts, pre-recorded classes, and online platforms — reached urban, middle-class students reasonably well. For children in rural areas where internet access is limited or nonexistent, where households may not own a television, or where multiple children compete for a single shared device, remote learning was largely theoretical. The students who most needed continuity of education were the ones least likely to receive it.

Bangladesh's Remote Learning Response — What Worked and What Didn't

The government's response to school closures was faster than many expected. By April 2020 — just weeks after schools closed — the Ministry of Primary and Mass Education had launched "Amar Ghore Amar School" (My School Is at My Home), a televised class program that broadcast pre-recorded lessons through national television. Online platforms were developed. Teacher training moved online. The World Bank redirected its existing education portfolio to support the response, developing a $14.8 million COVID-19 School Sector Response project funded through the Global Partnership for Education.

Stipend programs were expanded. The Bank-financed secondary education program provided stipends and tuition support to 2.5 million secondary students — 900,000 boys and 1.6 million girls aged 11 to 17 — to help keep them financially connected to schooling even when classrooms were closed. Trained facilitators contacted nearly 1,000 vulnerable adolescent girls and boys and their families to encourage them to remain enrolled. More than 1,000 Grade 6 math teachers completed online professional development courses.

But academic research on the effectiveness of these interventions is consistent in its finding: remote learning in Bangladesh's context delivered significantly less actual learning than in-person instruction. Neither teachers nor students felt confident with virtual learning. The infrastructure was inadequate for the population it needed to serve. Evidence from comparable contexts globally showed that students in remote classes learned substantially less and were more likely to drop out. Bangladesh's experience followed this pattern.

The Learning Loss That Became Permanent

The most alarming finding from global education research on pandemic school closures is what happens when learning loss is not actively addressed. A Grade 3 child who lost one year of schooling during the pandemic could lose up to three years' worth of learning in the long run — because foundational gaps in literacy and numeracy compound as students progress through grades, falling further behind curriculum expectations with each passing year.

Bangladesh's education system entered the post-pandemic period without the remedial education infrastructure needed to prevent this compounding effect. The Secondary and Higher Education Division secretary told reporters in late 2022 that learning losses could not be recovered fully. Education rights advocates described the 2022 situation as unchanged from 2021, with no meaningful improvement in education investment and no serious government initiative to address the accumulated learning deficit.

Only 34% of children in Grade 3 in Bangladesh had foundational reading skills after the closures, according to UNICEF data. Only 18% had foundational numeracy skills. Among children who had dropped out of school in the prior year, just 29% had foundational reading skills, compared with 39% of children who stayed in school. The gap between those who remained connected to education and those who fell away was already measurable and significant — and it will widen further without sustained investment in catch-up learning.

What Recovery Actually Requires

The global education evidence on post-pandemic recovery is clear about what works: structured remedial programs that target specific learning gaps, extended school time, tutoring support for the most disadvantaged students, and financial incentives that keep vulnerable children — particularly girls — in school rather than in marriages or the workforce. These are not complicated interventions. They are expensive ones, requiring sustained political will and budget commitment.

Bangladesh committed to blended education approaches in its post-pandemic planning, with the government and international partners working toward a more resilient and digitally inclusive education system. A new national curriculum began piloting in 2022. Stipend programs have continued. But education advocates have consistently noted that investment levels remain insufficient relative to the scale of the damage, and that accountability mechanisms for education quality remain weak.

The World Bank estimates that without corrective action, today's generation of schoolchildren globally faces $17 trillion in lost lifetime earnings. For Bangladesh, with 37 million children whose education was disrupted and a pre-existing learning crisis that the pandemic amplified, the cost of inaction is not measured in school years. It is measured in human potential that will determine whether the country's economic aspirations — including its transition out of least developed country status, its export competitiveness, and its demographic dividend — are actually realized or quietly forfeited.

The classrooms reopened. But reopening classrooms and restoring learning are not the same thing.

win-tk.org is a wintk publication — covering Bangladesh's education, health, and development through data-driven analytical journalism.